March 10th, 2008

Voters deal blow to government in anti-austerity referendum landslide

Hungary’s governing Socialist-Liberal coalition was dealt a sharp blow yesterday with the passage by overwhelming margins of three referendum questions aimed at rolling back elements of the government’s reform program.

While earlier public opinion surveys had pointed to a passage of the measures, the overall turnout and margins of victory for the “yes” votes both exceeded expectations.

With 99.9% of ballots counted, the three measures – which sought to revoke fees for doctors’ visits, hospital stays, and college attendance – had passed with 82.4%, 84.0% and 82.2%, respectively, the national election office (OVI) reported.

Meanwhile, unlike a similar referendum in 2004, which was declared void due to a lack of turnout, more than 50% of registered voters turned out at the polls yesterday, guaranteeing that the balloting was declared valid.

“Austerity, money collection and multiple taxation are not reforms,” said Viktor Orbán, former prime minister and chairman of main opposition party Fidesz, which initiated the referendum 18 months ago. “Hungarians want a new direction.”

In addition, the results indicated that Fidesz had managed to draw to its corner a large number of voters normally more sympathetic to the Socialists. The approximately 3.2 million voters who turned out to support the “yes” campaigns was significantly higher than the 2.3 million votes the party received in the last general election, in which it suffered and unexpected upset.

In its campaign, Fidesz sought not only to rally those upset at paying directly for services previously free of such charges, but to highlight what they say was the government’s heavy-handed approach in adopting the reforms.

Orbán Threatens New Referendum
Following the successful referendum, Fidesz leader Orbán said this morning that unless the government repealed a law adopted last month reforming the country’s health insurance system, it too would be overturned in a similar national plebiscite. Such a vote, he said, would come in September, or just six months before the country’s next-scheduled general elections, which public opinion polls show Fidesz almost certain to win.

Ft 5 Billion Spent on Campaigns, Voting
Sunday’s vote capped off a campaign by the governing parties and their main opponent that saw them spend a combined total of under Ft 500 million (just over €2 million) for PR, while Parliament had earlier appropriated Ft 4.5 billion to administer the vote.

According to a report on napi.hu, the Socialists spent between Ft 150 million and Ft 200 million and the SZDSZ between Ft 50 million and Ft 80 million trying to convince voters of the benefits of the fees. For its part, Fidesz refused to provide precise figures on its expenditures relating to the referendum, with one official saying only that the party “spent less on the ‘yes’ votes than the government [spent in public money] on the ‘no’ votes.”

Government Down, Not Out
While the opposition was quick to paint the referendum results as a humiliation for the deeply unpopular coalition, the government just as quickly moved to defuse the situation, saying it would respect the will of the voters and withdraw the fees as soon as possible.

At the same time, the government dismissed the notion that the referendum was a vote of no confidence in itself or its drive to reform the country’s creaky social-services system, which had earlier led to speculation that the coalition would not survive the vote.

“If it was the intention of the opposition to topple the government than this referendum was a failure because it cannot, and will not, achieve that,” said Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány. (For more on the medium-term political implications of the referendum, click here.)

Meanwhile, Gyurcsány was quick to point out that while the fees would be withdrawn, the government would not be making up the difference with new revenue for doctors, hospitals or universities.

Currently, public approval ratings for the prime minister and his government are at near-record lows, with Gyurcsány’s personal rating at just under 20%.

Parliament to Debate Bill Enacting Referendum
Earlier this morning, Gyurcsány proposed that Parliament hold discussions Tuesday on a bill required to implement the referendum, writes FigyelőNet. The bill abolishing medical and tuition fees, which would likely become effective next month, can be downloaded from Miniszterelnok.hu, the official site of the PM (in Hungarian).

In a letter sent to Speaker Katalin Szili, Gyurcsány said that normal Parliamentary rules would have to be disregarded in order to hold discussions in one session on both the general outlines and specifics in the bill. He also suggested that final voting be held on the bill on Monday, March 17.

Last week the government said it would abolish the fees on which Sunday’s referendum was held as soon as possible if the result so required, and also made a decision not to compensate doctors, hospitals and universities for the funds lost if the fees were abolished.

The official explanation for this decision is that the Constitutional Court’s review of the referendum questions found that the topics do not direct relate to the budget.

But it is widely believed that that the government’s decision not to re-allocate money to make up the shortfall stems from a desire to demonstrate to the population the need for additional financing for such services by the people who use them.

The two members of the governing coalition – the Socialist Party (MSZP) and the Free Democrats (SZDSZ) – had earlier debated when the fees should be abolished if the referendum was a success. The referendum questions specified January 1, 2009, but it was decided that it would not have been easy to explain to voters why they had to continue paying the fees until the end of the year.

Local Officials Take Action
Meanwhile, according to medical portal weborvos.hu, at least one Hungarian hospital has already stopped collecting the fees which are to be abolished as a result of yesterday’s referendum. Árpád Kallai, director of Hódmezővásárhely’s Erzsébet Hospital, said that he had made a decision not to collect any fees from patients from Monday, and this decision was approved by the local government which operates the hospital. Kallai told the portal that he was not worried about being fined for not following a regulation that is still in effect, adding that the immediate abolishing of the fees is legitimate because an even larger than average ratio of residents of the town voted “yes” in the referendum.

Finally, the mayor of Esztergom told Inforadio.hu that the local government will give the city’s family doctors an extra Ft 60,000 (€226) every month if the government does not make up for the money lost by the overturning of the doctors visit fees. Meggyes said that this will cost the local government an annual Ft 8 million, adding that while Esztergom has reserves that can be used for such compensation, 90% of other local governments in Hungary cannot afford to do the same.

[Editor's Note: The above story was initially posted at 08:30 CET and will be updated over the course of the day.]

Topics
Share
Comments
The All Hungary Media Group is firmly committed to freedom of expression and therefore applies a mostly "hands off" approach to comment moderation. Comments left by readers represent their own views and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the staff, editors or owner of the All Hungary Media Group, who nonetheless reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic or which moderators consider to constitute "hate speech." Also note that in order to prevent spam we generally close entries off to comments several days after publication.

7 Comments

  1. Vándorló says:

    It’s great you’ve finally woken from your slumber, but this is yesterday’s news so the prospect of updates throughout the day isn’t so enticing the day after the event. Yesterday it would have been interesting to hear about the build up of the cordon around parliament with 2,000 police on standby, of the protest in by the far right that grew slightly after the results, or even a blow by blow account of the stats as widely reported in Hungarian. I guess to English speakers the weekend king.

  2. shutupdude says:

    Do you think the staff writers at Caboodle are at your beck and call Sir Vandorlo? I’m sure they’re beside themselves over the fact they didn’t get round to giving you a special blow-by-blow account yesterday. After all, it was only SUNDAY! Like, er, the day most people don’t work. Smart arse comments like yours are typical of the pseudo intellectual set in Hungary who talk a good game, but when it actually comes to the crunch, don’t know their arses from their elbows.

  3. Vándorló says:

    shutupdude,
    As I’m not Hungarian your blow to my ego only bruised it slightly and as my Hungarian is upper-intermediate to advanced I rarely need anyone’s help.
    Yes, yesterday was *Sunday*, but as that happens to be the day of the referendum, that people prefer to rest is largely irrelevant.
    Do you not remember their sister rag mauling the BBC for not taking their job seriously? (http://www.pestiside.hu/20061017/journalist-unashamed-to-have-slept-through-budapest-riots/).
    cheers *dude*

  4. Erik says:

    Vándorló: FYI, I simply decided that since the results were largely within expectations there was no problem waiting until the A.M. to post something. And note that in fact there has been a fair amount of movement this morning on the story. More broadly, my attitude is that the only stuff that really needs to go out ASAP is important “spot” news, e.g. pitchfork-wielding peasants besieging the capital. Otherwise, no posting on Sunday, even if the BBC guy decides to get out of bed. :)

  5. taki says:

    hey, Vándorló, this is a local pol blog, not an international news service. and thank me for not being sarcastic.

  6. Vándorló says:

    @taki: I’d prefer to hear your sarcasm.
    @Erik: While the ‘yes’ vote was expected, the level of turn out was *not* and that was news. The winners can be justifiably proud that they received around 600,000 more votes to get rid of the reforms than did the ruling party in the general elections. And given the predictions of apathy, this is a good sign if a double edged one for Hungarians. At least they are willing to participate in ballots even if it is only to upset the people they voted for.

  7. Bill says:

    Well, perhaps Vandorlo’s criticism isn’t totally off the mark …. this page hasn’t exactly been “updated over the course of the day,” or “updated at all,” in fact ….