Hungary and Slovakia, smarting from mutual accusations of failing to rein in radical nationalism, issued a joint statement on advancing reconciliation between the two countries at a summit between prime ministers Ferenc Gyurcsany and Robert Fico.
Promising to combat nationalism, intolerance and its violent manifestations, the two leaders however also engaged in sharp exchanges at a joint press conference after the meeting in the border town of Komarno, Slovakia.
Fico complained about Hungarian “fascists” exporting their ideologies to Slovakia, and accused the Hungarian government of failing to do enough to stop them. Gyurcsany insisted that Slovakia’s government had not so much as flirted with radical nationalism and anti-Hungarian policies as embraced them fully.
Tensions between the two countries escalated after Fico formed a coalition over two years ago with a nationalist party headed by Jan Slota, who has often hurled insults at Slovakia’s ethnic Hungarian community and Hungarian public figures.
Gyurcsany accused his counterpart of not doing enough to distance himself from the anti-Hungarian remarks of his coalition partner, and complained too that Fico had stood by while Slovak policies discriminating against ethnic Hungarians had been implemented.
Since the end of the First World War, which saw the break up of the Austro-Hungarian Empire with the Treaty of Trianon, Slovakia has been home to a large community of ethnic kin mainly centred around the border where the two leaders met.
Many Slovaks see the 500,000-600,000-strong Hungarian community has the fulcrum of radical nationalist sentiment from over the border. After Hungarian football supporters were assaulted by police at a match with an ethnic Hungarian team in Dunajska Streda on November 1, radicals in Hungary burned the Slovak flag.
Fico said that if the flag-burning had happened the other way round — in other words, had Slovaks been caught burning the Hungarian flag — then the perpetrators would have been prosecuted.
Hungary, for its part, is angered by what is sees as prejudiced treatment of the Hungarian community there. A key Hungarian complaint is that the education ministry controlled by Slota’s Slovak National Party has discriminated against Hungarian-language schools.
Fico told the news conference that he intended in future to distance himself from remarks by the Slovak National Party which defamed Hungary or its politicians. But he added that no one should attempt to dictate how democratic Slovakia forms its government.
Gyurcsany said Fico’s response to the issue of the police assault on Hungarian citizens at the match was unsatisfactory. He said that evidence had so far indicated that the police’s actions were neither proportionate nor conformed to the law. It is disappointing that Hungary has still not received the results of an inquiry into the incident in spite of repeated requests, he said.
But despite their sharp words, the joint statement expressing “strong and unequivocal opposition” to radical ideologies and movements was seen by many Hungarian politicians as a move forward.
The two leaders have undertaken to oppose “any kind of extremism, xenophobia, intolerance, chauvinism, nationalism and every manifestation of violence …” and to “…use all political and legal means necessary to fight these phenomena …”
The statement also commits the two countries to exchange information and co-operation during the investigation of specific cases of harm against national minorities.
National minorities form a “natural connection” between of the two countries, enriching and strengthening relations, the statement says. “Education of the national minorities of the two countries serves the objective of preserving [their] ethnic and cultural identity.”
Both countries’ citizens wish to live in “an atmosphere of good neighbourly relations.” They are determined to deepen bilateral co-operation in all areas, the joint statement continues.
Further, Slovakia and Hungary will advance “the cause of cross-border co-operation” and economic and social ties, it concludes.
No real breakthrough could have been expected at the summit but it is significant in itself that dialogue has started, Matyas Eorsi, a senior liberal Free Democrat official, told MTI. Eorsi, chairman of parliament’s foreign affairs committee, said that Hungary must win the support of Slovak democrats and Slovakia must examine and publish a report into what took place at the match in Dunajska Streda.
Conservative opposition Fidesz criticised the lack on any mention of the Forum of Hungarian Representatives of the Carpathian Basin (KMKF) in the joint statement. The Slovak parliamentary resolution outlawing ethnic Hungarian representatives from participating in the KMKF was unacceptable, and it was regrettable that Gyurcsany had not ensured that the issue appeared in the contents of the joint statement, said the party’s spokesman.
Fidesz party tries to collect some political points, but it tries on the wrong place. If hungarian representation would have been led with such claims there would be no concensus at all possible.
It doesn’t take a genius to realize that, if we take one step back (viz. go back say three years), it becomes obvious why things have come to this between Hungary and Slovakia. 1. A fiercely nationalistic government came into power in Slovakia two years ago, which has been, to put it mildy, openly biased against ethnic Hungarians. 2. Resurgence of Hungarian right-wing extremism caused by political and economic frustration, wchich was brought about the incumbent Hungarian government and its leader.
Seesh is correct. Unless you – vdx- think that all Hungarians are radicals and that’s why there is a Jobbik Party.
Most Hungarians who I talked to in the past 2 years are frustrated with both parties, because they think this is a game to score points, but leave the entire country behind on many issues. Radicalism wouldn’t have risen, unless you got a bunch of unsatisfied people.
make that a hat trick!
munkacsy, Jobbik party and Magyar Garda is there in the first place because of the lenient legal system in Hungary.
vdx
Jobbik and Magyar Gárda is here because it is perfectly LEGAL to be here !
We even have a perfectly legal bunch of idiot communist lovers,called MunkásPárt and it also has a youth movement–pathetically small and obscure, but perfectly LEGAL—that’s called Freedom of Choice, something that Hungarians fought for in 1956—You might not like our politics but how can you possibly justify taking away the peoples freedom of choice ?? Even I do not call for the banning of the commie political groups !.
Now please go away and stop making a nuisance of yourself.
“vdx- munkacsy, Jobbik party and Magyar Garda is there in the first place because of the lenient legal system in Hungary.”
VDX- I don’t know where you live, but sure as hell as it’s not democracy.
If you go to any democratic nation, they do have al sorts of parties, going with Germany (Nationalist Party), England (nationalist party), USA (KKK and real nazi parties) and many many more.
If you live in Slovakia, you just haven’t realized that THE party in control of your state is the nationalist party itself and the reason it won’t allow any other parties, because they want full control. You live in a nationalist dictatorship, my friend.
Of course, I be wrong , that you don’t live in Slovakia, but the rest I know for sure I’m not wrong.
munkacsy,
I’m among the last ones that would like to stand up and defend Slota’s party, but I will do it if I notice one-sided single-purpose hungarian motion behind.
In Slovakia Jan Slota is considered to be the gift to Hungarians. Why? Because such primitive figures only provide Hungarians with ultimate excuses for not being obliged to begin their inner dialogue about 88-years old post-war trauma. It is be about time, you know..
It was strange like Hungarians at fist pronounced that SNS is radical and extremist party and ater realizing it won’t go that way, they came up with nationalism. Nationalism is the reserved term for ideologie that gives excessive and unhealthy accent to one country’s nation. Did you know that abbreviation SNS stands for Slovak National Party? Marking someone as “nationalist” is just one step further towards radicalism that marking someone as “national”. And national feelings have all of us, don’t we?
Simply if I compare agenda and practices of political parties in Hungary to Slota’s SNS then I would be forced to mark all of them as nationalist. One after another.
Btw did you know that yesterday (at velvet revolution remembrance day) there was a manifestation in Bratislava where a group of people shouted “Freedom to nationalist”? How would you explain this if – according to you and hungarian government – nationalist sit in slovak government? So yes, there are nationalist groups in Slovakia, but obviously they don’t consider Slota one of them.