November 5th, 2009

Churches denounce new census law for excluding question on religion

Churches denounce new census law for excluding question on religion

Hungary’s Catholic, Reformed and Lutheran Churches on Wednesday expressed criticism over the recently-passed law on the 2011 census, which will exclude several questions earlier on the survey, including that on religion.

President Laszlo Solyom has refused to sign the law designed on the census and has sent it back to parliament for reconsideration. The law bans census officers from asking about the health status of respondents, including fertility or disabilities, or to inquire about their religion. The president argued that such information gives important indications of society and that the census, held once in every ten years, should be consistent in order to enable meaningful comparisons.

The churches issued a joint statement in which they express their surprise that the question on religion, which has always been on the questionnaire except under the communist years, should now be banned.

The ruling Socialist party has said it was open to including a question on disabilities, but would not support the question about people’s religious faith. “There are no services provided by the state which would require such information,” Valeria Deak Fogarasi, deputy chairwoman of the parliamentary committee for human rights, said.

Topics
Share
Comments
The All Hungary Media Group is firmly committed to freedom of expression and therefore applies a mostly "hands off" approach to comment moderation. Comments left by readers represent their own views and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the staff, editors or owner of the All Hungary Media Group, who nonetheless reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic or which moderators consider to constitute "hate speech." Also note that in order to prevent spam we generally close entries off to comments several days after publication.

One Comment

  1. Half a dozen says:

    Is the president allowed to refer a law back to
    parliament for reasons other than it being
    unconstitutional? Is he just playing politics???