Top NewsCome join us on our August Twitter vacation 
May 21st, 2015

Demonstration against “national consultation on immigration and terrorism” in Budapest

refugees migrants

Several hundred people marched from Deák Square to Parliament yesterday evening to protest the government’s immigration policy, especially the “national consultation on immigration and terrorism,” hvg.hu reports.

The protesters listened to speeches after gathering in the central Budapest square. Several immigrants spoke, emphasizing that they had to flee their countries because of terrorism, so they do not understand why they are being labelled as “terrorists” by the government. One of them said he felt welcomed by Hungarians, and is grateful to the state of Hungary for receiving him. Ferenc Kőszeg, the co-founder of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, said Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is voicing obsolete ideas merely to try and stop the drop in public support for himself and his party.

After marching to Parliament the protesters made paper ships out of the “national consultation” questionnaires sent to households across the country and lit candles to remember the several thousand migrants who have died trying to cross the Mediterranean. The initiative cost a reported HUF 1 billion, or twice as much as the state spends on the provision of refugees and immigrants every year.

Share
Please note that due to a large volume of trolling and false abuse flags, we are currently only accepting comments from logged-in users.
  • Truth will set you free!

    Hungary learned it’s lesson from immigration. Immigration tore the country apart and we lost 2/3 of it after trianon. Keep immigration in the west.. where in many places such as London or Paris a white man cannot enter in fear because of diverse”multiculturism”

    • ViktorZorroban

      You and Orban are totally right! Hungary doesn’t need immigrants, what we need is incest and inbreeding:
      http://index.hu/belfold/2015/05/21/apa_es_fia_eveken_at_egyutt_eroszakolta_a_csalad_lanyait/

      • wolfi
      • DoubleH63

        Not the funniest Jew in the world, I hope you know that this Zsindex article is about a Gypsy crime (which of course we all know does not exists).

        • gavroche

          leto is a homo. and double hh is a jew. pazmany peter mondta: ki miben tudos abban gyanos

          • DoubleH63

            You got me old Jewess. Actually I am a Jew-Gypsy mutt. Look more like a darkie Gypsy – but I am properly metélt, do you want to see?
            I will post you a picture of me and my “kiccsalád”. Aren’t we beautiful?

      • rftftfgtgt efttgtt

        http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inbreeding

        My ignorant friend: You do not know the meaning of inbreeding.

        noun, Biology

        the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter,brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase thenumber of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and thereforeincreases the appearance of recessive traits.

    • National Hiphop

      OMG, another Leto clone!! Are you migrating too?

    • gavroche

      OK, honey, don’t t enter, because of your fear of multiculturalism. you are afraid even of a single culture. culture is dangerous for idiots.

  • Truth will set you free!

    You and your types on the left are the biggest hypocrites. I bet you anything that you live in your lily white neighborhood far away from all diversity.

    Belgian Whites Being Violently Ethnically Cleansed by Third World Immigrants

    May 13, 2013 by TNO Staff— in Europe · 0 Comment

    Yet another example of violent ethnic cleansing—this time by Third World immigrants in the town of Cheratte in northeastern Belgium—has illustrated the ongoing program of displacement of Europeans in their historical homeland.

    According to a report in a local French-language newspaper, a white family has filed a complaint with the police after being forced to move out of a neighborhood where they have lived for the past 15 years.

    According to the report, the family has suffered years of racial abuse from the nonwhite immigrants, and their youngest member, Nathan, 17, has been beaten and chased off the streets with shouts of “Dirty Belgian, dirty white.”

    The article states that Nathan and his family will soon move out of the area (called Cheratte) after filing a suit alleging extreme verbal and physical aggression suffered by the young man last Sunday.

    On Sunday evening, Nathan and his girlfriend were walking in Cheratte when he was accosted by someone identified as “Huseyn, a young guy in the neighborhood.”

    The insults flew: “Dirty Belgian, dirty white,” and Nathan was told that he was in Turkey, not Belgium.

    Then Nathan was physically assaulted, and ended up in the hospital.

    “This time, I have decided to move,” his mother told the newspaper, “This is not the first time that local youths have attacked him. The insults are common. But this time it went too far.”

    • gavroche

      go to hell. you won’t be an illegal alien.

  • Truth will set you free!

    You wacko’s on the left will be the first to cry!!!
    600,000 move out in decade of ‘white flight’ from London: White Britons are now in minority in the capital

    Census figures show that 620,000 white Britons left the capital in a decade

    White Britons are the minority in London for the first time

    They make up 45 per cent of London’s population, with Asians being the second largest group

    By Jack Doyle for the Daily Mail

    Published: 21:19 GMT, 20 February 2013 | Updated: 00:22 GMT, 21 February 2013

    722

    View
    comments

    More than 600,000 white British Londoners have left the capital in a decade.

    Census figures show that between 2001 and 2011 the level of ‘white flight’ reached 620,000.

    It is the equivalent of a city the size of Glasgow – made up entirely of white Britons – moving out of the capital.

    White Britons are now a minority in the country’s capital with 620,000 leaving in a decade

    The figures, reported by the BBC yesterday, mean that for the first time, white Britons are now in a minority in the country’s largest city.

    At the same time, the census shows, some rural areas have seen a rise in the proportion of people who describe their ethnicity as ‘white British’.

    Some 3.7million Londoners classified themselves as white British in 2011 – down from 4.3million in 2001 – despite the city’s population increasing by nearly one million over the decade to 8.2million.

    Sir Andrew Green of MigrationWatch thinks that the BBC should have addressed such a serious issue less trivially

    White Britons now make up 45 per cent of the population, compared with 58 per cent in 2001.

    London’s population has been boosted by immigrants. Three million foreign-born people now live in the capital.

    Five London boroughs saw the proportion of white Britons fall by more than a quarter. The largest decline was in Newham, East London, where the decrease was 37.5 per cent.

    In Barking and Dagenham, on the East London/Essex border, 80 per cent of residents were white British in 2001 but by 2011 the proportion was 49 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281941/600-000-decade-white-flight-London-White-Britons-minority-capital.html#ixzz3amxqmhKC
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    • Hungarian

      What this have to do with Hungary? Hungary is about 1.2% non-EU immigrant and the quotas would only ask Hungary to accept 307 refugees.

      • craig_white

        But they won’t stay in Hungary, they would move west to make us even happier, as we don’t have enough of them ! !

    • Democrat

      And so what. The UK is the fastest growing European economy. London is the most diverse city in Europe. That diversity has made it one of the culturally richest cities in the world. It remains a major financial centre, it attracts more tourists than most other cities in the world.

      These right wing papers love to spread these statistics. They never mention how many of the “non-whites” are British citizens. Their selective reporting is along the lines of Orban`s recent propaganda.

      • Varga

        I totally agree with you. These right wing loonies consider being white as a supreme skin color, but of course they never mention the fact that these different colored people are tax paying citizens just like they are and contribute just as much to the economy. What is the deal with being white? Also, I find it rather funny that many “white” skinned people don’t even know they have many different cultural backgrounds themselves and their ancestors migrated from somewhere else as well. But when they look in the mirror they see they are white and don’t care about anything else. It is nothing more than stupid people wanting to feel they are something special.

        • Vidra

          A century ago Catholics in the USA were barred from many public service jobs and were criticised as lazy, violent and superstitious. Italians were supposedly labelled as “wops” (afternoon, Uncle Erik) because they arrived without papers – in other words, they were all illegal immigrants.
          With any luck, in another hundred years the colour of somebody’s skin will be just as irrelevant as religion is now.

      • craig_white

        Oh dear, what do you now about LDN ? Were you born here? Growing up here ? Those “culturally diverse” places are no-go zones after 9 p.m. Residents from London’s colourful neighbourhoods are milking the system the most. Duhhh

      • rftftfgtgt efttgtt

        Diversity (with people from diferent civiliaztions, especially primitive african and asian) creates cultural decline in the countries with high culture like European countries..

  • Truth will set you free!

    Smug Diversity Pushers and the Safe White Neighborhoods They Live In

    Frank Borzellieri, VDARE, February 23, 2014

    The hypocrisy of white liberals over integration and the wonderful enrichment that mass immigration is supposed to bring is the gift that never stops giving. If there is one thing you can be absolutely sure of whenever you hear a white liberal espousing the vital importance of diversity, it is that the same person lives in a safe, lily-white community.

    What was termed “white flight” in the 1950s and 1960s is a demographic fact of life and everyone knows it. No less an unwilling witness than the U.S. government has reported what everyone knows: when the non-white population of a community reaches between 10 and 20 percent, whites simply leave. Whites will not live in non-white neighborhoods in any meaningful percentage. [The Residential Preferences of Blacks and Whites: A Four-Metropolis Analysis, Housing Policy Debate, January 1997 (PDF)]

    I personally, as a libertarian, think all people—black, white, Hispanic, or Asian—should be allowed to live anywhere they want without being browbeaten or forced to live where they don’t want to. My problem is with white liberals who claim that “diversity is strength” but whose actions are very different when it comes to their own lives, their own homes, their own children and their own neighborhoods.

    All of this brings me to the particular white liberal hypocrites who have caused me to be fired as a Catholic school principal, not once but twice, for political writings that were never secret and which Monsignor Michael Hull, the “Censor Librorum” of the New York Archdiocese, had already approved as not in violation of Catholic teaching. (See Jared Taylor’s article on the incident [PDF] and this video interview.)

    Corinne Lestch, (email her) the New York Daily News reporter who wrote the defamatory 2011 article that threw the New York Archdiocese into panic, is a left-wing activist and who prides herself on destroying people who don’t toe the Politically Correct line on race

    Surely, if there is one white person who must absolutely certainly practice what she so devotedly preaches, it must be Corinne Lestch.

    But where does Corinne Lestch live? Well, in Bronxville, New York, a town that is 92 percent white and just one percent black!

    No integration or diversity for Corinne Lestch and her family—just for everyone else!

    Fran Davies, (email her) the public relations director for the Archdiocese of New York, who was instrumental in getting me fired from Our Lady of Mount Carmel School in 2011.

    Davies is another blowhard when it comes to the great wonders and benefits of racial integration and diversity.

    Any diversity for her? Yeah, right. Davies lives in the exclusive town of Bedford, New York, a place that is 88 percent white and 1 percent Hispanic.

    I guess diversity is only a strength for other people, not for your family, right, Fran?

    New York Archdiocese spokesman Joseph Zwilling (email him) said in an official statement my views were incompatible with Catholic teaching, contrary to what I had been told four years earlier.

    Zwilling is nevertheless living more in accordance with my “incompatible” views than with those he claims for the Church—in Franklin Square, New York, which is 92 percent white and less than one percent black!

    Oh my, Joe, how can you deprive your family of the joyous benefits of multi-racialism that you claim to believe in so much?

    Timothy McNiff, (email him) the school superintendent who answers only to the Cardinal himself.

    McNiff in a meeting impressed upon me the need to embrace multiculturalism, and actually said “diversity is our strength.” But he lives in the lily-white town of Fairfax Station, Virginia, which is 84 percent white and three percent black!

    In a hilarious irony, McNiff and his family live in the same area as Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance—whom McNiff thinks is a “white supremacist.”

    But when it comes to his own home and his own family, McNiff prefers the choices and lifestyle of Jared Taylor than the lifestyle he claims to believe in.

    Even in the home he has taken in New York, McNiff has chosen a spot on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, which is described by a city website as follows:

    For many class-conscious residents, there’s simply no other place to live. Since the late 1800s, it has been the place for Manhattanites who value the cachet of their address, as well as for those who truly appreciate the serenity, charm and rich architecture inherent in the neighborhood’s personality.

    Well, well. “Class-conscious”; “cachet”; “serenity, charm and rich architecture.” Isn’t that nice?

    By the way, the Upper East Side is also 89 percent white and only 2 percent black.

    Why not live in the black section of Harlem, Tim, which is only a few miles away? What about the south Bronx or Bedford Stuyvesant in Brooklyn, Tim, if diversity is such a strength? Why are you assiduously avoiding this great strength for yourself and your family?

    Eric Rapaglia, the priest who fired me, after weeks of assuring me that he would stand by me (and who used my heterodox writings in a Sunday homily).

    Fr. Rapaglia does live in a largely non-white immigrant neighborhood in the Bronx, but because he is assigned there as a priest. His family on Long Island, Staten Island and Florida all live in white neighborhoods.

    Is he going to fire them, too?

    This hypocrisy on the part of white liberals who push racial integration on everyone else, yet avoid it in their own lives has become cliché. It’s right up there with death and taxes.

    White liberal hypocrisy may be a cliché—but it’s not a joke. It destroys lives. I would end this article with a picture of my own residence, but having lost two jobs and exhausted my savings, I am now homeless.

    • gavroche

      my god! this guy has logorrhea, (in hungarian it means szajmenes.

  • MagyarViking

    The initiative cost a reported HUF 1 billion, or twice as much as the state spends on the provision of refugees and immigrants every year


    Hear!, Hear!

  • Truth will set you free!

    White countries for everyone?

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, but White countries for everyone?

    Anti-Whites all agree that Africa belongs to Black people, and the various mixed-race Muslim groups in North Africa. So when White people in the past, or the Chinese today move into Africa so much that Black people into become a minority – anti-Whites all agree that’s wrong.

    Similarly, anti-Whites all agree that Asia belongs to Asian (Oriental, and Indian) people.

    Anti-Whites will never go to these countries and campaign so millions of immigrants can pour into a non-White country and “diversify” some of the homogenous non-White countries, such as Japan which is 98.5% Japanese, as well as a first world country.

    Africa would benefit from millions of Asian or South American immigrants to do the work that Africans don’t want to do, or can’t do. But, anti-Whites don’t object to the fact that millions of non-Black immigrants moving in Africa would eventually make Africa minority Black.

    So you see, open borders policies only ever apply to White countries. White countries are not meant to be for a specific group of people, anti-Whites say. They say that all White countries today are meant to exist for an idea – not a race or group of people.

    It is very ironic that democracy is one of the ideas anti-Whites claim “Western” (White) countries should exist for. It’s ironic because they ignore the opinion of the majority of people, and go ahead and promote this “mixed race melting pot of diversity”, where White countries used to be.

    Black countries exist for Black people. Asian countries exist for Asians, but White countries are for everyone? That’s genocide!

    • Curious George

      Moron!

    • seinean

      Tell that to the Afrikkaners. They’ll invite you to a braai for sure.

    • gavroche

      stop yekking. it is enough!!!!!!!!!!

  • Mr. Szécsi seems to have serious problems either with his numerical skills or his English skills.

    hvg.hu reported “Mintegy százötvenen” (about 150 people).
    That’s not “several hundred people”, no matter how you twist it, Mr. Szécsi.

    • National Hiphop

      There were literally several hundred people on the spot, Mr. Leto (alias Self-hating Nazi Coward Gayboy). It takes someone who was there to judge the skills of these fine news outlets.
      You obviously didn’t turn up, so shut yer gob 😀

      • So did hvg.hu lie then, te nagyon ocsmány szadobüdöskomcsi buziféreg? 😉
        Why does Mr. Szécsi refer to the article in hvg.hu as his news source and why does he write “several hundreds” when according to hvg.hu there were only about 150 demonstrators?

        • National Hiphop

          Dunno, maybe you should ask him, coward of a buzzancs.
          FYI, 444.hu also wrote about several hundred protesters, and one of their journalists was definitely on the spot. Now, póg mo thóin.

          • Yes, in fact my post was addressed to him, not you, te ocsmány szadobüdöskomcsi buziféreg.

          • National Hiphop

            It’a pity he doesn’t give a toss about you, szarcsimbók 😀

          • I completely understand he’s embarrassed about this. After all he probably regards himself a journalist.

  • Truth will set you free!

    …………………Meanwhile in “Tolerant” Israel……………………………
    Racism in Israel

    Bob Dreyfuss on December 23, 2013 – 1:15 PM E

    Then-US Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, listens to Israel’s President Shimon Peres, not seen, during a meeting in Jerusalem. (AP Photo)

    Here is a shocking fact from a poll conducted by the Israel Democracy Institute and reported by the Times of Israel: fully one-third of Israelis say that unlawful, vigilante violence against non-Jewish African immigrants is fine with them.

    Equally, 86 percent of Israelis who voted for the right-wing Shas party and 66 percent of Likud voters agree with the statements of far-right Israeli politician Miri Regev that African immigrants, mostly from Sudan and Eritrea, are a “cancer” in the Israeli body politic.

    The IDI poll analysis says :

    A “cancer” in the body of the nation? More than half (52%) of the Jews agree with the statement of Member of Knesset Miri Regev that the unauthorized Africans living in Israel are a cancer in the body of Israel. Only 19% of the Arab respondents agreed with the statement. 


    It adds:

    How much support is there for the demonstrations against the presence of Africans by residents of south Tel Aviv? Here we practically found a “national consensus”: an overwhelming majority of 83% of the Jews expressed support for the demonstrations; among the Arabs, the number came to only 25%.

    Israel is building refugee camps—let’s not use the loaded term “concentration camps”—for many of the estimated 55,000 Eritrean, Sudanese and other African refugees from civil wars and conflicts who’ve entered Israel, mostly undocumented, over the last decade or so. Reports The Washington Post, “Between 2005 and 2012, African migrants came in a trickle, then a flood, pouring across Israel’s border with Egypt, with a peak of 17,258 in 2011.” The paper adds:

    The newly constructed “open facility” is designed to hold up to 3,300 illegal immigrants. It is not a prison, but not exactly a shelter, either. Residents will be required to answer roll call three times a day. They are not allowed to seek work. The facility is surrounded by a fence topped with spools of razor wire, and the migrants will be locked down at night.

    Israeli Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar bluntly links his concerns to the fear of losing the “Jewish” nature of Israel:

    “There are currently around 30 million people moving around Africa, people who have left their home countries and are looking for a place to be. We can all understand that pressure, but if we are too liberal, then we will lose the country. We will lose the only Jewish country that exists.”

    Israel is seeking to deport the African migrants to Uganda, an ironic notion, since in the early days of Zionism Uganda was once held out as a long-shot possibility to host the creation of a Jewish state for European Jewish refugees.

    Tensions and protests by the migrants, along with anti-African violence by vigilante citizens of Israel, has been on the rise. Reports Al Jazeera:

    Tensions began on Dec. 10, when the Knesset passed an amendment to the Anti-Infiltration Law, which authorized the detention without trial of approximately 55,000 Africans currently living in Israel. On Dec. 12, Israeli prison officials began transferring Africans from the Saharonim prison to the brand-new Holot facility, which is still under construction only a few hundred meters away in southern Israel. Once the first 1,000 beds are filled with Africans from Saharonim, the government plans to move another 2,000 Africans now in Tel Aviv to the detention center.


    Needless to say, Israel exists because millions of Jewish refugees, many of whom entered Israel illegally during and after the Holocaust and World War II, built it. Says Al Jazeera:

    Israeli society rejects asylum seekers because they’re new, they’re poor and they’re darker-skinned. But over the decades, successive waves of Jewish immigrants also encountered hostility from native Israelis because of the same prejudices. The asylum seekers from Africa constitute the first large group of immigrants to Israel who are not Jews. That is the real reason the government is trying to drive them out.

    Israeli public opinion is being shaped by a grotesque Knesset member who has become a joke and a former MK whose party didn’t get enough votes to make it into the legislature. If it weren’t so sad, we’d be laughing until we cried. But now our tears should be over the unbelievable fact that these two marginal characters, these clowns, MK Miri Regev (Likud) and Michael Ben Ari, have, with their hateful incitement, succeeded in dictating the national agenda on the issue of African migrants and asylum seekers. From now on we’ll have to choose: Either you support the refugees, or you support the state (and the longtime residents of south Tel Aviv). Who decided that? Regev and Ben Ari.

    In a strong conclusion, Levy says:

    It’s Israel that made the African migrants a problem. That’s what incitement does. Since the border is closed and international conventions bar their deportation, the state should allow those already here to work, to rebuild their lives, and offer them the prospect of becoming citizens through a gradual, careful process. That’s how it’s done in normal countries. Israel is too small, too weak to do this? Nonsense, merely too racist.

    Watch Next: Max Blumenthal and David Sheen’s report on African migrants in Israel

    • gavroche

      perhaps you meant arbeit macht frei?

  • rftftfgtgt efttgtt

    MAny people confuse the term of political refugees with economic refugees. Many of these refugees had no ID card and passports, nobody know check their real identity. They arrive with illegal border crossing.

All content © 2004-2015 The All Hungary Media Group. Articles, comments and other information on the All Hungary Media Group's network of sites are provided "as is" without guarantees, warranties, or representations of any kind, and the opinions and views expressed in such articles and columns are not necessarily those of the All Hungary Media Group.